Summarized by:
Mohammad Fahri Pratama
4EB17
24211575
| 
Subject | 
Objective | 
Penyajian | 
Pengukuran |  | 
Pengakuan | 
| 
Chapter 1: 
-         
  Introduction
  to International Financial Reporting Standards 
-         
  Origins
  and early history of the IASB 
-         
  The
  Current Structure 
-         
  Process
  Of IFRS Standard Setting 
-         
  Convergence:
  the IASB and Financial Reporting in the US 
-         
  The IASB
  and Europe 
-         
  IFRS
  for SMEs | 
Develop the public
  interest, a single set of high quality, understandable, enforceable and
  globally accepted financial reporting standards based upon clearly
  articulated principles. 
This model of accounting
  moderating relationships between company and the state, it serve for tax
  assessment, and to limit individual dividend payment, it also protecting the
  running economy by sanctioning individual businesses that are not financially
  run imprudently. 
The trustees of the
  IFRS foundation have both the responsibility to raise funds needed to finance
  standard setting, and appointing members to the IASB. 
The IASB’s agenda is
  determined in various ways. Suggestion made by the trustees, the IFRS
  advisory council, liaison standard setters, the international audit firms,
  and others. 
With the end of the
  MoU with FASB, FASB has become a member of ASAF. 
IFRS have to be
  enshrined in the EU statute law, creating a situation where the EU is in the
  effect ratifying as laws. 
Issued by the IASB to
  reduce the financial reporting burden of small, and medium sized entities. | 
The display
  introduces us to the new format of the era of the new worldwide accounting
  standard. 
It shows us
  historically how’s the regulation before GAAP and IFRS. 
Shows us the role of
  IFRS and IASB systematically. 
the IASB has a formal
  due process, which is currently set out in the IASB and IFRS interpretation. 
Explains how the
  convergence happens in the US economic. 
Determined the EU
  standards setting which massively affect the EU economic on the setting of
  the accounting standards. 
Explains the
  difference between each standard setters and how to apply it economically.  | 
The document states
  that the SEC “will consider, among other things, whether a single set of high
  quality global accounting standard is achievable”. A single set of global
  standard means IFRS and US GAAP as the two comprehensive financial reporting
  frameworks in the world. 
The IASC new
  leadership, reviewed and revised the existing standards. And new standards
  were created to fill perceived gaps in IFRS.  
Working relationships
  are set up with local standard setters who have adopted or converged with
  IFRS. 
The due process
  comprises six stages: (1) setting the agenda; (2) project planning; (3)
  developing and publishing a discussion paper; (4) developing and publishing
  an exposure draft; (5) developing and publishing the IFRS and (6) procedures
  after an IFRS issued.   
IFRS would need to
  satisfy the following three criteria: (1) establish a core set of standards
  that constituted a comprehensive basis; (2) enable investor to analyze
  performance; (3) interpreted and applied. 
Registrants using any
  deviation from pure IFRS, and those using any other national GAAP, will
  continue to be required to present a reconciliation to US GAAP. 
The standard is a
  stand alone document with only one optional cross reference to full IFRS for
  financial instruments. |  | 
In 2007, the SEC
  dropped he reconciliation requirement that had formerly applied to foreign
  private registrants. In the effect, the SEC was acknowledging that IFRS was
  full acceptable as a basis for accurate, transparent, meaningful financial
  reporting. 
The IFRS were in need
  of strengthening, particularly as to reducing the range of diverse but
  accepted alternatives  for similar
  transactions and events. The challenges 
  presented to IASC  ultimately
  would serve to make IFRS stronger. 
IASB  is an independent body that is solely responsible
  for establishing IFRS. Including IFRS for SMEs. The IASB also approves new
  interpretation. 
The revised IASB and
  IFRS interpretations committee  due
  process handbook has an introduction section dealing with oversight, which is
  identifies the responsibility of  the
  due process oversight committee. 
The principal
  organizations of academician in the US is actively working on standards for
  IFRS-based accounting curricula. 
The EU line up behind
  full and complete adherence to officially promulgated IFRS. 
The responsibility
  lies with each jurisdictions to determine which entities should apply IFRS
  for SMEs. | 
 
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar